TY - JOUR
T1 - Emperors, Columns and Aristocrats: Christian Imperial Politics in the Late Fifth Century CE as Reflected in the Life of Daniel the Stylite
AU - McEvoy, Meaghan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Johns Hopkins University Press.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This paper examines the hagiography of Daniel the Stylite, believed to have been written by one of his disciples soon after the saint's death at Constanti- nople in the late fifth century. It first explores the identity of Daniel's named patrons, highlighting the status of these individuals as members of former imperial families who were not currently in power in the East, but who were competing with the reigning emperors of the day for patronage of the holy man. Second, it highlights the imperial-like manner of the hagiographer's pre- sentation of Daniel, particularly his column-dwelling existence with its anal- ogies to imperial columns in the city, and his ordination by the hand of God, and it suggests that the author was shaping his presentation of the holy man to appeal to the Christian court of his day. Both of these aspects of the text indicate that the hagiographer wished to present Daniel as the pre-eminent holy man of late fifth-century Constantinople, whose monastery was worthy of future patronage by emperors or aristocrats with imperial connections.
AB - This paper examines the hagiography of Daniel the Stylite, believed to have been written by one of his disciples soon after the saint's death at Constanti- nople in the late fifth century. It first explores the identity of Daniel's named patrons, highlighting the status of these individuals as members of former imperial families who were not currently in power in the East, but who were competing with the reigning emperors of the day for patronage of the holy man. Second, it highlights the imperial-like manner of the hagiographer's pre- sentation of Daniel, particularly his column-dwelling existence with its anal- ogies to imperial columns in the city, and his ordination by the hand of God, and it suggests that the author was shaping his presentation of the holy man to appeal to the Christian court of his day. Both of these aspects of the text indicate that the hagiographer wished to present Daniel as the pre-eminent holy man of late fifth-century Constantinople, whose monastery was worthy of future patronage by emperors or aristocrats with imperial connections.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141830252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1353/jla.2022.0023
DO - 10.1353/jla.2022.0023
M3 - Article
SN - 1939-6716
VL - 15
SP - 428
EP - 461
JO - Journal of Late Antiquity
JF - Journal of Late Antiquity
IS - 2
ER -