Abstract
Government intervention in markets is generally undesirable as there are substantial costs to such interference. What then is the rationale for the patent intervention? If R&D costs are high and imitation times are relatively speedy, then an innovating company may not have sufficient exclusive time in the market to recoup R&D costs through higher prices. Where such innovation has substantial positive spillover benefits, society would wish to provide an incentive for this to occur.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Place of Publication | Canberra, Australia |
Commissioning body | Australian Government Advisory Council on Intellectual Property |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |