Abstract
We investigate the behavior of the empirical minimization algorithm using various methods. We first analyze it by comparing the empirical, random, structure and the original one on the class, either in an additive sense, via the uniform law of large numbers, or in a multiplicative sense, using isomorphic coordinate projections. We then show that a direct analysis of the empirical minimization algorithm yields a significantly better bound, and that the estimates we obtain are essentially sharp. The method of proof we use is based on Talagrand's concentration inequality for empirical processes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 311-334 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Probability Theory and Related Fields |
| Volume | 135 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2006 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Empirical minimization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver