Abstract
In Barker and Dowe (2005), Stephen Barker and Phil Dowe present a range of arguments which they take to demonstrate the paradoxical nature of endurantism. I claim that the endurantist has convincing replies to each argument.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 29-32 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Manuscrito |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Endurantism endures: Rejoinder to barker and dowe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver