Energy-efficient computational chemistry: Comparison of x86 and ARM systems

Kristopher Keipert, Gaurav Mitra, Vaibhav Sunriyal, Sarom S. Leang, Masha Sosonkina, Alistair P. Rendell, Mark S. Gordon*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The computational efficiency and energy-to-solution of several applications using the GAMESS quantum chemistry suite of codes is evaluated for 32-bit and 64-bit ARM-based computers, and compared to an x86 machine. The x86 system completes all benchmark computations more quickly than either ARM system and is the best choice to minimize time to solution. The ARM64 and ARM32 computational performances are similar to each other for Hartree-Fock and density functional theory energy calculations. However, for memory-intensive second-order perturbation theory energy and gradient computations the lower ARM32 read/write memory bandwidth results in computation times as much as 86% longer than on the ARM64 system. The ARM32 system is more energy efficient than the x86 and ARM64 CPUs for all benchmarked methods, while the ARM64 CPU is more energy efficient than the x86 CPU for some core counts and molecular sizes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)5055-5061
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation
    Volume11
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Energy-efficient computational chemistry: Comparison of x86 and ARM systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this