TY - JOUR
T1 - Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks
T2 - Delay Analysis Considering Energy Costs of Sensing and Transmission
AU - Liu, Wanchun
AU - Zhou, Xiangyun
AU - Durrani, Salman
AU - Mehrpouyan, Hani
AU - Blostein, Steven D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/7
Y1 - 2016/7
N2 - Energy harvesting (EH) provides a means of greatly enhancing the lifetime of wireless sensor nodes. However, the randomness inherent in the EH process may cause significant delay for performing sensing operations and transmitting sensed information to the sink. Unlike most existing studies on the delay performance of EH sensor networks, where only the energy consumption of transmission is considered, we consider the energy costs of both sensing and transmission. Specifically, we consider an EH sensor that monitors some status property and adopts a harvest-then-use protocol to perform sensing and transmission. To comprehensively study the delay performance, we consider two complementary metrics and analytically derive their statistics: 1) update age-measuring the time taken from when information is obtained by the sensor to when the sensed information is successfully transmitted to the sink, i.e., how timely the updated information at the sink is, and 2) update cycle-measuring the time duration between two consecutive successful transmissions, i.e., how frequently the information at the sink is updated. Our results show that the consideration of sensing energy cost leads to an important tradeoff between the two metrics: more frequent updates result in less timely information available at the sink.
AB - Energy harvesting (EH) provides a means of greatly enhancing the lifetime of wireless sensor nodes. However, the randomness inherent in the EH process may cause significant delay for performing sensing operations and transmitting sensed information to the sink. Unlike most existing studies on the delay performance of EH sensor networks, where only the energy consumption of transmission is considered, we consider the energy costs of both sensing and transmission. Specifically, we consider an EH sensor that monitors some status property and adopts a harvest-then-use protocol to perform sensing and transmission. To comprehensively study the delay performance, we consider two complementary metrics and analytically derive their statistics: 1) update age-measuring the time taken from when information is obtained by the sensor to when the sensed information is successfully transmitted to the sink, i.e., how timely the updated information at the sink is, and 2) update cycle-measuring the time duration between two consecutive successful transmissions, i.e., how frequently the information at the sink is updated. Our results show that the consideration of sensing energy cost leads to an important tradeoff between the two metrics: more frequent updates result in less timely information available at the sink.
KW - Energy harvesting
KW - delay analysis
KW - energy costs of sensing and transmission
KW - wirelessly powered communications
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978924127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TWC.2016.2543216
DO - 10.1109/TWC.2016.2543216
M3 - Article
SN - 1536-1276
VL - 15
SP - 4635
EP - 4650
JO - IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
JF - IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
IS - 7
M1 - 7435327
ER -