Enron discourse: The rhetoric of a resilient capitalism

R. J. Craig*, J. H. Amernic

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    86 Citations (SciVal)

    Abstract

    This paper analyzes two examples of micro-discourse that have emerged in the Enron saga: first, the Letter to Shareholders in Enron's Year 2000 Annual Report; and second, the testimony provided by the CEO of Andersen, Joseph Berardino, to the U.S. Congress in December 2001. The intent is to inform the grander (or mega) discourse relating to Enron and to corporate collapse, US-style.The micro -perspective reveals a rhetoric that is integral to sustaining the ideology of capitalism and to ensuring its resilience and long-term survival. We highlight the authors' reverence of "the market" and a win-at-all-costs form of capitalism; their reification of the business corporation; and their confounding view of the significance of accounting. The micro -discourse also suggests that several of the corporate leaders implicated in the collapse of Enron were deceitful, deceptive, egocentric, arrogant, hubristic and harbored delusional complexes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)813-852
    Number of pages40
    JournalCritical Perspectives on Accounting
    Volume15
    Issue number6-7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Enron discourse: The rhetoric of a resilient capitalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this