Environmental change and enteric zoonoses in New Zealand: A systematic review of the evidence

Aparna Lal*, Adrian W.T. Lill, Mary McIntyre, Simon Hales, Michael G. Baker, Nigel P. French

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: To review the available evidence that examines the association between climatic and agricultural land use factors and the risks of enteric zoonoses in humans and consider information needs and possible pathways of intervention. Methods: The electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science and Embase and government websites were searched systematically for published literature that investigated the association of climatic and/or agricultural exposures with the incidence of the four most common enteric zoonotic diseases in New Zealand (campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis, cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis). Results The 16 studies in the review demonstrated significant associations between climate, agricultural land use and enteric disease occurrence. The evidence suggests that enteric disease risk from environmental reservoirs is pathogen specific. In some rural regions, environmental pathogen load is considerable, with multiple opportunities for zoonotic transmission. Conclusions: Enteric disease occurrence in NZ is associated with climate variability and agricultural land use. However, these relationships interact with demographic factors to influence disease patterns. Implications: Improved understanding of how environmental and social factors interact can inform effective public health interventions under scenarios of projected environmental change.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)63-68
    Number of pages6
    JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
    Volume39
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental change and enteric zoonoses in New Zealand: A systematic review of the evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this