Environmental conflict resolution: Relational and environmental attentiveness as measures of success

Tony Foley

doi:10.1002/crq.186

Environmental conflict resolution: Relational and environmental attentiveness as measures of success

Tony Foley^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When evaluating the success of environmental conflict resolution (ECR), the use of traditional measures of success, such as agreement-counting and participant satisfaction surveys, provide an incomplete picture. This article proposes two measures to evaluate ECR in terms of both process and outcome: Is the process transformative of the participants? Is the process designed to be attentive to environmental outcomes?

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	485-504
Number of pages	20
Journal	Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Volume	24
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.186
Publication status	Published - Jun 2007

Access to Document

10.1002/crq.186

Cite this

@article{e063dd354baf472bbd843ea77f850dcf,

title = "Environmental conflict resolution: Relational and environmental attentiveness as measures of success",

abstract = "When evaluating the success of environmental conflict resolution (ECR), the use of traditional measures of success, such as agreement-counting and participant satisfaction surveys, provide an incomplete picture. This article proposes two measures to evaluate ECR in terms of both process and outcome: Is the process transformative of the participants? Is the process designed to be attentive to environmental outcomes?",

author = "Tony Foley",

year = "2007",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1002/crq.186",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "485--504",

journal = "Conflict Resolution Quarterly",

issn = "1536-5581",

publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental conflict resolution

T2 - Relational and environmental attentiveness as measures of success

AU - Foley, Tony

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - When evaluating the success of environmental conflict resolution (ECR), the use of traditional measures of success, such as agreement-counting and participant satisfaction surveys, provide an incomplete picture. This article proposes two measures to evaluate ECR in terms of both process and outcome: Is the process transformative of the participants? Is the process designed to be attentive to environmental outcomes?

AB - When evaluating the success of environmental conflict resolution (ECR), the use of traditional measures of success, such as agreement-counting and participant satisfaction surveys, provide an incomplete picture. This article proposes two measures to evaluate ECR in terms of both process and outcome: Is the process transformative of the participants? Is the process designed to be attentive to environmental outcomes?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547668680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/crq.186

DO - 10.1002/crq.186

M3 - Article

SN - 1536-5581

VL - 24

SP - 485

EP - 504

JO - Conflict Resolution Quarterly

JF - Conflict Resolution Quarterly

IS - 4

ER -

Environmental conflict resolution: Relational and environmental attentiveness as measures of success

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this