Environmental Reporting and its Relation to Corporate Environmental Performance

Peter M. Clarkson*, Michael B. Overell, Larelle Chapple

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    491 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study examines how both the level and the nature of environmental information voluntarily disclosed by Australian firms relate to their underlying environmental performance. Disclosure is scored using an index developed by Clarkson (2008) based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines and the environmental performance measure is based on emission data available from the National Pollutant Inventory (NPI). The sample consists of 51 firms that reported to the NPI in both 2002 and 2006. The findings are as follows. First, descriptive statistics indicate that while there was modest improvement in disclosure between 2002 and 2006, the highest disclosure score obtained was just slightly in excess of 50% of the maximum available based on the GRI Guidelines. Second, the results consistently indicate that not only do firms with a higher pollution propensity disclose more environmental information; they also rely on disclosures that the GRI views as inherently more objective and verifiable. Taken together, these results suggest that concerns regarding the reliability of voluntary environmental disclosures in the Australian context remain valid and thereby potentially signal a need for both enhanced mandatory reporting requirements and improved enforcement. In this regard, our study also informs regulatory policy on mandatory disclosures of environmental performance.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)27-60
    Number of pages34
    JournalAbacus
    Volume47
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental Reporting and its Relation to Corporate Environmental Performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this