Environmental social controls and capital investments: Australian evidence

Dorothy Wood*, Donald G. Ross

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Environmental social controls (ESCs) such as mandatory disclosure, regulations, subsidies, and stakeholder opinion are intended to improve firm environmental performance. This paper reports ESC importance to Australian financial managers in making capital investment decisions. A decision-making experiment showed managers to be most responsive to stakeholder opinion (42 per cent), followed by subsidization (26 per cent) and regulatory cost (22 per cent). Mandatory disclosure has very little influence (10 per cent). ESC interaction effects are limited so coordination of ESC policy is not a primary concern. High degrees of managerial self-insight suggest policy changes would be enhanced by close consultations with the managers involved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)677-695
    Number of pages19
    JournalAccounting and Finance
    Volume46
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental social controls and capital investments: Australian evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this