Epistemic aspects of representative government

Robert E. Goodin, Kai Spiekermann

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The Federalist, justifying the Electoral College to elect the president, claimed that a small group of more informed individuals would make a better decision than the general mass. But the Condorcet Jury Theorem tells us that the more independent, better-Than-random voters there are, the more likely it will be that the majority among them will be correct. The question thus arises as to how much better, on average, members of the smaller group would have to be to compensate for the epistemic costs of making decisions on the basis of that many fewer votes. This question is explored in the contexts of referendum democracy, delegate-style representative democracy, and trustee-style representative democracy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)303-325
    Number of pages23
    JournalEuropean Political Science Review
    Volume4
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic aspects of representative government'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this