Abstract
Knowledge ascriptions seem context sensitive. Yet it is widely thought that epistemic contextualism does not have a plausible semantic implementation. We aim to overcome this concern by articulating and defending an explicit contextualist semantics for 'know,' which integrates a fairly orthodox contextualist conception of knowledge as the elimination of the relevant alternatives, with a fairly orthodox "Amherst" semantics for A-quantification over a contextually variable domain of situations. Whatever problems epistemic contextualism might face, lack of an orthodox semantic implementation is not among them.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 491-543 |
| Number of pages | 53 |
| Journal | Philosophical Studies |
| Volume | 168 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic comparativism: A contextualist semantics for knowledge ascriptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver