Epistemic preparedness

Warwick Anderson*, Kari Lancaster, Sonja van Wichelen, Seye Abimbola, Rachel A. Ankeny, Lukas Engelmann, Lyle Fearnley, Tamara Giles-Vernick, Benjamin Hegarty, Freya L. Jephcott, Nicolo P. Ludovice, Janet Roitman, Jacob Steere-Williams, Mark Stoove, John Noel Viana, Catherine Waldby, Rachel Yang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Preparedness strategies for emergent infectious diseases have focused on microbial surveillance, medical stockpiling and healthcare infrastructure resilience. But what does it mean to be epistemically or cognitively prepared for the next disease outbreak? Taking stock of lessons for data practices and statistical modelling in the wake of COVID-19, we propose a reconceptualising of preparedness in global health, focusing on ecological and sociological configurations or framings rather than resorting to reductive 'crisis technologies'. We address three problem areas: data collection and sharing, outbreak modelling and the spatiotemporal structuring of analysis and intervention. We take these as illustrative of troubling effects of conceptual inflexibility. We inquire into alternative data practices and more complex epidemiological framings. This refiguring of our cognitive toolkit implies working through colonial legacies and national limitations embedded in governance of epidemiological reasoning. Epistemic preparedness-focusing on a more diverse, equitable and inclusive stocktaking as much as stockpiling-provides a reliable foundation for future disease outbreak management.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere018719
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalBMJ Global Health
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jun 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic preparedness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this