Abstract
Upon numerical testing of our earlier theoretical results, we found a trivial algebraic error in Boschi et al. (2019), that had an impact on the numerical results published in that article. In the following, we describe the error and summarize the corrections that should be applied to the results (Formula Presented) (Figure Presented) In a new study by our team that is currently in preparation, eq. (28) of Boschi et al. (2019) and eq. (2) from this study are both validated numerically; synthetic tests show that, after correcting the errors, attenuation models a(?) can be retrieved successfully through the inversion procedure described by Boschi et al. (2019).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1090-1092 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Geophysical Journal International |
Volume | 222 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2020 |