Erratum: Studying the ISM at ∼10 pc scale in NGC 7793 with MUSE: I. Data description and properties of the ionised gas (A&A (2020) 635 A134 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937173)

Lorenza Della Bruna; Angela Adamo; Arjan Bik; Michele Fumagalli; Rene Walterbos; Göran Östlin; Gustavo Bruzual; Daniela Calzetti; Stephane Charlot; Kathryn Grasha; Linda J. Smith; David Thilker; Aida Wofford

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937173e

Erratum: Studying the ISM at ∼10 pc scale in NGC 7793 with MUSE: I. Data description and properties of the ionised gas (A&A (2020) 635 A134 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937173)

Lorenza Della Bruna^*, Angela Adamo, Arjan Bik, Michele Fumagalli, Rene Walterbos, Göran Östlin, Gustavo Bruzual, Daniela Calzetti, Stephane Charlot, Kathryn Grasha, Linda J. Smith, David Thilker, Aida Wofford

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

The parametrisation of the MUSE line spread function (LSF) provided in the original paper refers to the instrumental full width at half maximum (FWHM) and not to σ, as mentioned in the text and erroneously assumed when fitting the Hα line. Figure 1 shows the revised Hα velocity dispersion map. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the updated BPT-σ' line ratio diagram and σHα distribution. For the latter distribution, we now recover median values (±first, third quartiles) of σHα;Hii = 18:8+5:2 -6:1 km s-1 and σHα;DIG = 26:1+5:4 -5:3 km s-1. The general trends stated in the original paper remain unchanged. In the original manuscript there has also been a mistake in the computation of the fraction of diαuse ionised gas ( fDIG). The corrected fractions are the following: fDIG ∼ 15% (21%) for the Hα sample and fDIG ∼ 21% (27%) for the Hα/[S ii] sample, where we have indicated the values prior to reddening correction in parenthesis.

Original language	English
Article number	C6
Journal	Astronomy and Astrophysics
Volume	652
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937173e
Publication status	Published - 1 Aug 2021

Access to Document

10.1051/0004-6361/201937173e

Cite this

Della Bruna, L., Adamo, A., Bik, A., Fumagalli, M., Walterbos, R., Östlin, G., Bruzual, G., Calzetti, D., Charlot, S., Grasha, K., Smith, L. J., Thilker, D., & Wofford, A. (2021). Erratum: Studying the ISM at ∼10 pc scale in NGC 7793 with MUSE: I. Data description and properties of the ionised gas (A&A (2020) 635 A134 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937173). Astronomy and Astrophysics, 652, Article C6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937173e

@article{c8671422cbae4aa6acd297c46418c3d6,

title = "Erratum: Studying the ISM at ∼10 pc scale in NGC 7793 with MUSE: I. Data description and properties of the ionised gas (A&A (2020) 635 A134 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937173)",

abstract = "The parametrisation of the MUSE line spread function (LSF) provided in the original paper refers to the instrumental full width at half maximum (FWHM) and not to σ, as mentioned in the text and erroneously assumed when fitting the Hα line. Figure 1 shows the revised Hα velocity dispersion map. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the updated BPT-σ' line ratio diagram and σHα distribution. For the latter distribution, we now recover median values (±first, third quartiles) of σHα;Hii = 18:8+5:2 -6:1 km s-1 and σHα;DIG = 26:1+5:4 -5:3 km s-1. The general trends stated in the original paper remain unchanged. In the original manuscript there has also been a mistake in the computation of the fraction of diαuse ionised gas ( fDIG). The corrected fractions are the following: fDIG ∼ 15% (21%) for the Hα sample and fDIG ∼ 21% (27%) for the Hα/[S ii] sample, where we have indicated the values prior to reddening correction in parenthesis.",

author = "{Della Bruna}, Lorenza and Angela Adamo and Arjan Bik and Michele Fumagalli and Rene Walterbos and G{\"o}ran {\"O}stlin and Gustavo Bruzual and Daniela Calzetti and Stephane Charlot and Kathryn Grasha and Smith, {Linda J.} and David Thilker and Aida Wofford",

year = "2021",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1051/0004-6361/201937173e",

language = "English",

volume = "652",

journal = "Astronomy and Astrophysics",

issn = "0004-6361",

publisher = "EDP Sciences",

}

Della Bruna, L, Adamo, A, Bik, A, Fumagalli, M, Walterbos, R, Östlin, G, Bruzual, G, Calzetti, D, Charlot, S, Grasha, K, Smith, LJ, Thilker, D & Wofford, A 2021, 'Erratum: Studying the ISM at ∼10 pc scale in NGC 7793 with MUSE: I. Data description and properties of the ionised gas (A&A (2020) 635 A134 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937173)', Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 652, C6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937173e

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Studying the ISM at ∼10 pc scale in NGC 7793 with MUSE: I. Data description and properties of the ionised gas (A&A (2020) 635 A134 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937173)

AU - Della Bruna, Lorenza

AU - Adamo, Angela

AU - Bik, Arjan

AU - Fumagalli, Michele

AU - Walterbos, Rene

AU - Östlin, Göran

AU - Bruzual, Gustavo

AU - Calzetti, Daniela

AU - Charlot, Stephane

AU - Grasha, Kathryn

AU - Smith, Linda J.

AU - Thilker, David

AU - Wofford, Aida

PY - 2021/8/1

Y1 - 2021/8/1

N2 - The parametrisation of the MUSE line spread function (LSF) provided in the original paper refers to the instrumental full width at half maximum (FWHM) and not to σ, as mentioned in the text and erroneously assumed when fitting the Hα line. Figure 1 shows the revised Hα velocity dispersion map. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the updated BPT-σ' line ratio diagram and σHα distribution. For the latter distribution, we now recover median values (±first, third quartiles) of σHα;Hii = 18:8+5:2 -6:1 km s-1 and σHα;DIG = 26:1+5:4 -5:3 km s-1. The general trends stated in the original paper remain unchanged. In the original manuscript there has also been a mistake in the computation of the fraction of diαuse ionised gas ( fDIG). The corrected fractions are the following: fDIG ∼ 15% (21%) for the Hα sample and fDIG ∼ 21% (27%) for the Hα/[S ii] sample, where we have indicated the values prior to reddening correction in parenthesis.

AB - The parametrisation of the MUSE line spread function (LSF) provided in the original paper refers to the instrumental full width at half maximum (FWHM) and not to σ, as mentioned in the text and erroneously assumed when fitting the Hα line. Figure 1 shows the revised Hα velocity dispersion map. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the updated BPT-σ' line ratio diagram and σHα distribution. For the latter distribution, we now recover median values (±first, third quartiles) of σHα;Hii = 18:8+5:2 -6:1 km s-1 and σHα;DIG = 26:1+5:4 -5:3 km s-1. The general trends stated in the original paper remain unchanged. In the original manuscript there has also been a mistake in the computation of the fraction of diαuse ionised gas ( fDIG). The corrected fractions are the following: fDIG ∼ 15% (21%) for the Hα sample and fDIG ∼ 21% (27%) for the Hα/[S ii] sample, where we have indicated the values prior to reddening correction in parenthesis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113875251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1051/0004-6361/201937173e

DO - 10.1051/0004-6361/201937173e

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0004-6361

VL - 652

JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics

JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics

M1 - C6

ER -

Erratum: Studying the ISM at ∼10 pc scale in NGC 7793 with MUSE: I. Data description and properties of the ionised gas (A&A (2020) 635 A134 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937173)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this