TY - CHAP
T1 - ETHICS OF RESEARCH USING DIGITAL TRACE DATA
T2 - A Computational Social Science Perspective
AU - Ackland, Robert
AU - Vivanco, M. Francisca Bórquez
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 selection and editorial matter, Bruce M. Smyth, Michael A. Martin, and Mandy Downing; individual chapters, the contributors.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Although the invention of the web and social media has provided new opportunities for unobtrusive social research, ethical frameworks and regulations have been slow to adapt to changes in technology—leaving some ethical considerations open to interpretation by both researchers and ethics committees. Furthermore, traditional approaches to social science research ethics are better suited to ‘top-down’ research designs (e.g., surveys)—since primary data collections are prone to participant reactivity—whereas digital trace data research designs are based upon the use of secondary data, tend to be unobtrusive, ‘bottom-up’ and case-by-case. We contend that ethical clearance frameworks for research using digital trace data should be responsive, prospective to the use of secondary data, and common across institutions. While we highlight the distinct approach to ethics in digital trace data research, we emphasise that the usual considerations for human research ethics still apply: (a) informed consent, (b) distinction between private and public individuals, (c) confidentiality, and (d) cultural considerations.
AB - Although the invention of the web and social media has provided new opportunities for unobtrusive social research, ethical frameworks and regulations have been slow to adapt to changes in technology—leaving some ethical considerations open to interpretation by both researchers and ethics committees. Furthermore, traditional approaches to social science research ethics are better suited to ‘top-down’ research designs (e.g., surveys)—since primary data collections are prone to participant reactivity—whereas digital trace data research designs are based upon the use of secondary data, tend to be unobtrusive, ‘bottom-up’ and case-by-case. We contend that ethical clearance frameworks for research using digital trace data should be responsive, prospective to the use of secondary data, and common across institutions. While we highlight the distinct approach to ethics in digital trace data research, we emphasise that the usual considerations for human research ethics still apply: (a) informed consent, (b) distinction between private and public individuals, (c) confidentiality, and (d) cultural considerations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210694384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4324/9781003319733-37
DO - 10.4324/9781003319733-37
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85210694384
SN - 9781003319733
SP - 362
EP - 373
BT - The Routledge Handbook of Human Research Ethics and Integrity in Australia
PB - Taylor and Francis Ltd.
ER -