Evaluating the Quality of Planning in New Product Development Projects

Marco Antonio Amaral Feris, Ofer Zwikael

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    Abstract

    The research and development industry shifts significant resources, from physical products to software. This is triggered by the need to stay competitive in a tough market. However, the poor performance of new product development in the field of software development may restrict this trend. Following a research stream that focuses on NPD planning, we introduce the quality of planning evaluation model (QPEM) and a knowledge base for improving the quality of planning evaluation. QPEM suggests planning quality should be evaluated using two distinct and complementary approaches of top-down and bottom-up for enhancing the accuracy of planning: a) an established measure that assesses 16 planning products and b) a novel measure that assesses 55 factors that affect project performance. This second measure uses cognitive maps, which is a methodology based on expert knowledge that graphically describes the behaviour of a system, and represents the project managers know-how and characteristics, technological expertise, top management support, enterprise environmental factors, and the quality of methods and tools in a form that corresponds closely with humans perceptions. The alignment between these two approaches is demonstrated through multiple case studies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationScience, Markets & Society: Crossing boundaries, creating momentum
    Place of PublicationBelgium
    PublisherKU Leuven
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    EventR&D Management Conference - Leuven Belgium
    Duration: 1 Jan 2017 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceR&D Management Conference
    Period1/01/17 → …
    Other1-5 July 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the Quality of Planning in New Product Development Projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this