Evaluating the Quality of Proposed Projects' Target Benefits

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    Abstract

    Successfully implementing projects enhance operations efficiency and accelerate organizational growth. Given the limited organizational resources available, project funding is a critical decision to ensure the most appropriate projects are selected. Recent research suggests that a proposed projects target benefitsthose anticipated to be realized at project completionare important to consider when making decisions for project funding. Yet, the literature provides no measures to appraise the quality of target benefits. Consequently, sub-optimal projects are funded due to estimations errors, optimism bias, and strategic misrepresentation of target benefits. This paper presents four studies to develop and validate a new Quality of Target Benefits (QTB) scale consisting of three dimensions: specificity, attainability, and comprehensiveness. This scale can be used in organizations to objectively appraise a proposed projects target benefits and support an informed funding decision. It can also be used as an instrument to facilitate theory development in areas of operations management, decision making, goal setting, and performance measurement.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAcademy of Management Proceedings
    EditorsJohn Humphreys
    Place of PublicationNew York, United States
    PublisherAcademy of Management
    Pages39pp
    EditionPeer Reviewed
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015
    EventAnnual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2015 - Vancouver, Canada
    Duration: 1 Jan 2015 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceAnnual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2015
    Period1/01/15 → …
    OtherAugust 7-11 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the Quality of Proposed Projects' Target Benefits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this