Evaluation in environmental conservation: Issues of adequacy and rigour

Arianne Lowe*, Stephen Dovers, David Lindenmayer, Bennett Macdonald

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Significant effort and investment is committed to environmental conservation. How much conservation projects can achieve will be determined by the efficacy of this investment. Measuring project performance, establishing priorities and expenditure options requires examination of the relationship between goals, inputs and outcomes, based on clear evaluation methods. This paper reviews the recent status of project evaluation reported in the published, peer-reviewed environmental literature. The review: (1) estimates the frequency of published evaluations to be approximately 0.17% and, importantly (2) identifies the methodological foundations. This article finds that while there has been a recent increase in attention to evaluation in environmental conservation, there remains: (1) a paucity of peer-reviewed published evaluations (2) inadequate guidance on evaluation methods. Factors contributing to this situation are explored. This paper concludes that the methods and application of evaluation in environmental conservation - and thus the effectiveness of management - can be improved, and indicates how.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)245-275
    Number of pages31
    JournalInternational Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development
    Volume7
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation in environmental conservation: Issues of adequacy and rigour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this