TY - JOUR
T1 - Everyday youth participation? Contrasting views from Australian policymakers and young people
AU - Vromen, Ariadne
AU - Collin, Philippa
PY - 2010/2
Y1 - 2010/2
N2 - Youth participation, as a form of consultation within policymaking processes in Australia, has been largely critiqued for its reliance on formal participation mechanisms that are rarely inclusive or representative of a range of young people's experiences. This article shows that policymakers who are critical of formal methods of youth participation can identify contemporary effective practice and believe initiatives ought to be youth-led, purposeful, provide feedback and be creative and fun. Thus, there is a new awareness by policymakers of the effectiveness of integrating young people's everyday perspectives into participation. Similarly, it was found that participation and active involvement in decision making was meaningful for young people when it was youth-led, fun and informal, and based on relevant, everyday issues rather than complex policy processes. So why has youth participation remained static and focused mainly on new formal initiatives? To examine this contrast in views and practices, the article presents findings from four discussion groups convened with senior government and community policymakers and a qualitative examination of both marginalized young people's understanding of youth participation mechanisms and their capacity to influence policymaking that affected their everyday lives.
AB - Youth participation, as a form of consultation within policymaking processes in Australia, has been largely critiqued for its reliance on formal participation mechanisms that are rarely inclusive or representative of a range of young people's experiences. This article shows that policymakers who are critical of formal methods of youth participation can identify contemporary effective practice and believe initiatives ought to be youth-led, purposeful, provide feedback and be creative and fun. Thus, there is a new awareness by policymakers of the effectiveness of integrating young people's everyday perspectives into participation. Similarly, it was found that participation and active involvement in decision making was meaningful for young people when it was youth-led, fun and informal, and based on relevant, everyday issues rather than complex policy processes. So why has youth participation remained static and focused mainly on new formal initiatives? To examine this contrast in views and practices, the article presents findings from four discussion groups convened with senior government and community policymakers and a qualitative examination of both marginalized young people's understanding of youth participation mechanisms and their capacity to influence policymaking that affected their everyday lives.
KW - Australia
KW - Diversity
KW - Everyday political engagement
KW - Policymaking
KW - Youth participation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649247321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/110330880901800107
DO - 10.1177/110330880901800107
M3 - Article
SN - 1103-3088
VL - 18
SP - 97
EP - 112
JO - Young
JF - Young
IS - 1
ER -