Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Tropics: Are Developing Countries Different?

Stephen Howes, Ashlee Betteridge, Lawrence Sause, Lhawang Ugyel

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Evidence-based policy making has been advocated as much, if not more, for developing as developed countries. However, very little attention has been given to the conditions or prerequisites for evidence-based policy making, and whether these are in general more or less likely to hold in developing countries. We argue that an environment conducive to evidence-based policy making is one in which there are strong incentives for good policies to be adopted, a ready supply of such policies, a wide range of domains for them to be adopted into, and capable institutions to implement them, and a wide range of domains within which good policy can be adopted. Based on the development literature, our own experience, and the comparison of two countries, Australia and Papua New Guinea, we conclude that these conditions are all more likely to exist in developed than developing countries. Developing countries on the other hand have the advantage of foreign aid. Much foreign aid is dedicated to the purpose of facilitating evidence-based policy making. But we argue that at best this is a partial compensation for the other problems faced by developing countries in striving to base their policies more firmly on sound evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHybrid Public Policy Innovations
Subtitle of host publicationContemporary Policy Beyond Ideology
EditorsMark Fabian, Robert Breunig
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Chapter15
Pages253-271
Number of pages19
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781351245944
ISBN (Print)9780815371809
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Tropics: Are Developing Countries Different?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this