TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining the association between psychological wellbeing with daily and intra-individual variation in subjective wellbeing
AU - Burns, Richard Andrew
AU - Ma, Jennifer
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2015/8/1
Y1 - 2015/8/1
N2 - A number of studies identify distinct dimensions of psychological and subjective wellbeing. However, few investigations have examined how these distinctive wellbeing dimensions may be related over time. The present study aimed to contribute to this growing body of research by adopting a measurement burst design to examine the association between psychological functioning with daily and intra-individual variation in affect over a 14-day period, controlling for personality. Participants (. N=. 45) comprised a sample of Australian adults from Canberra, Australia who were observed on up to 14. days over a 2-week period (Mobs. =. 10.9 (SD. =. 3.1)). Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimates from a multi-level structural equation model identified psychological functioning as only weakly associated with daily positive affect, and unrelated to daily levels of negative affect and intra-individual variation in both affect domains when adjusting for demographic, personality and daily stressors. Positive and negative daily events were most strongly associated with positive and negative feelings, respectively. Post-hoc analysis within a Bayesian context confirmed our ML results whilst a Monte Carlo simulation identified sufficient statistical power of significant parameters. Overall, evidence for an association between psychological functioning and daily affect was not identified.
AB - A number of studies identify distinct dimensions of psychological and subjective wellbeing. However, few investigations have examined how these distinctive wellbeing dimensions may be related over time. The present study aimed to contribute to this growing body of research by adopting a measurement burst design to examine the association between psychological functioning with daily and intra-individual variation in affect over a 14-day period, controlling for personality. Participants (. N=. 45) comprised a sample of Australian adults from Canberra, Australia who were observed on up to 14. days over a 2-week period (Mobs. =. 10.9 (SD. =. 3.1)). Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimates from a multi-level structural equation model identified psychological functioning as only weakly associated with daily positive affect, and unrelated to daily levels of negative affect and intra-individual variation in both affect domains when adjusting for demographic, personality and daily stressors. Positive and negative daily events were most strongly associated with positive and negative feelings, respectively. Post-hoc analysis within a Bayesian context confirmed our ML results whilst a Monte Carlo simulation identified sufficient statistical power of significant parameters. Overall, evidence for an association between psychological functioning and daily affect was not identified.
KW - Bayesian analysis
KW - Intra-individual variability
KW - Multi-level modelling
KW - Psychological feeling
KW - Psychological functioning
KW - Psychological wellbeing
KW - Structural equation modelling
KW - Subjective wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924957568&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.023
DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.023
M3 - Article
SN - 0191-8869
VL - 82
SP - 34
EP - 39
JO - Personality and Individual Differences
JF - Personality and Individual Differences
ER -