TY - JOUR
T1 - Excluding livestock from farm dams enhances native biodiversity
AU - Bell, Kristian
AU - Evans, Maldwyn J.
AU - Lindenmayer, David B.
AU - Scheele, Ben C.
AU - Smith, David G.
AU - Malerba, Martino E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/3/15
Y1 - 2025/3/15
N2 - Amid a global biodiversity crisis and with over 50 % of the world's land dedicated to agriculture, solutions that enhance the biodiversity value of farmland are crucial. Fencing farm dams to prevent livestock access may provide numerous production and biodiversity benefits. However, we have limited information on the responses to fencing dams by various taxa, and its subsequent effect on community assemblages and ecosystem function. We investigated the impact of fencing farm dams on species richness, functional diversity, and community structure in a control-impact study in south-eastern Australia by comparing 20 fenced and 20 unfenced dams (40 dams total). We used a combination of in-person surveys, trail cameras, eDNA, and acoustic loggers to detect a wide range of fauna. We found significant differences in overall species richness, functional diversity and species composition between fenced and unfenced dams. Taxonomic groups including birds and mammals, and feeding guilds including carnivores and frugivores were more prevalent at dams that excluded livestock. Our results suggest that excluding livestock from farm dams preferentially benefits native species. At the species level, larger-bodied waterbirds such as dabbling ducks tended to prefer unfenced dams, while smaller woodland birds characteristic of nearby remnant woody native vegetation preferred fenced dams. We show that excluding livestock from farm dams has significant positive effects on biodiversity, ecosystem function and community structure.
AB - Amid a global biodiversity crisis and with over 50 % of the world's land dedicated to agriculture, solutions that enhance the biodiversity value of farmland are crucial. Fencing farm dams to prevent livestock access may provide numerous production and biodiversity benefits. However, we have limited information on the responses to fencing dams by various taxa, and its subsequent effect on community assemblages and ecosystem function. We investigated the impact of fencing farm dams on species richness, functional diversity, and community structure in a control-impact study in south-eastern Australia by comparing 20 fenced and 20 unfenced dams (40 dams total). We used a combination of in-person surveys, trail cameras, eDNA, and acoustic loggers to detect a wide range of fauna. We found significant differences in overall species richness, functional diversity and species composition between fenced and unfenced dams. Taxonomic groups including birds and mammals, and feeding guilds including carnivores and frugivores were more prevalent at dams that excluded livestock. Our results suggest that excluding livestock from farm dams preferentially benefits native species. At the species level, larger-bodied waterbirds such as dabbling ducks tended to prefer unfenced dams, while smaller woodland birds characteristic of nearby remnant woody native vegetation preferred fenced dams. We show that excluding livestock from farm dams has significant positive effects on biodiversity, ecosystem function and community structure.
KW - Farm dams
KW - Fencing
KW - Functional biodiversity
KW - Livestock exclusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=86000539900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2025.109623
DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2025.109623
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:86000539900
SN - 0167-8809
VL - 386
JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
M1 - 109623
ER -