Exit Stage Left: Modelling Judicial Exits inCanada and Australia

Andrew Banfield, Matthew Kerby

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    Abstract

    Given the prestige and job security attached to the position of supreme court justice, it is puzzling that these judges ever choose to vacate their seats on a voluntary basis. Using career data drawn from the Canadian Supreme and Australian High Courts, we examine which factors: personal, institutional, and political, are the most influential when determining voluntary judicial resignations at the highest level. We estimate a competing risks Cox proportional hazards model of judicial tenure to test hypotheses that personal factors (health, family) and institutional factors (satisfaction, workload) are the strongest determinants of various forms of voluntary exit in these two Westminster systems.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference 2012
    Place of PublicationUSA
    PublisherConference Organising Committee
    Pages1-18
    EditionPeer Reviewed
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    EventMidwest Political Science Association Annual Conference 2012 - Chicago, United States
    Duration: 1 Jan 2012 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceMidwest Political Science Association Annual Conference 2012
    Country/TerritoryUnited States
    Period1/01/12 → …
    OtherApril 11-14 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Exit Stage Left: Modelling Judicial Exits inCanada and Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this