TY - JOUR
T1 - Exoplanet detection yield of a space-based Bracewell interferometer from small to medium satellites
AU - Dandumont, Colin
AU - Defrère, Denis
AU - Kammerer, Jens
AU - Absil, Olivier
AU - Quanz, Sascha P.
AU - Loicq, Jérome
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Space-based nulling interferometry is one of the most promising solutions to spectrally characterize the atmosphere of rocky exoplanets in the mid-infrared (3 to 20 μm). It provides both high angular resolution and starlight mitigation. This observing capability depends on several technologies. A CubeSat (up to 20 kg) or a medium satellite (up to a few hundreds of kg), using a Bracewell architecture on a single spacecraft could be an adequate technological precursor to a larger, flagship mission. Beyond technical challenges, the scientific return of such a small-scale mission needs to be assessed. We explore the exoplanet science cases for various missions (several satellite configurations and sizes). Based on physical parameters (diameter and wavelength) and thanks to a state-of-the-art planet population synthesis tool, the performance and the possible exoplanet detection yield of these configurations are presented. Without considering platform stability constraints, a CubeSat (baseline of b 1 m and pupils diameter of D 0.1 m) could detect 7 Jovian exoplanets, a small satellite (b 5 m / D 0.25 m) 120 exoplanets, whereas a medium satellite (b 12.5 m / D 0.5 m) could detect 1/4250 exoplanets including 51 rocky planets within 20 pc. To complete our study, an analysis of the platform stability constraints (tip/tilt and optical path difference) is performed. Exoplanet studies impose very stringent requirements on both tip/tilt and OPD control.
AB - Space-based nulling interferometry is one of the most promising solutions to spectrally characterize the atmosphere of rocky exoplanets in the mid-infrared (3 to 20 μm). It provides both high angular resolution and starlight mitigation. This observing capability depends on several technologies. A CubeSat (up to 20 kg) or a medium satellite (up to a few hundreds of kg), using a Bracewell architecture on a single spacecraft could be an adequate technological precursor to a larger, flagship mission. Beyond technical challenges, the scientific return of such a small-scale mission needs to be assessed. We explore the exoplanet science cases for various missions (several satellite configurations and sizes). Based on physical parameters (diameter and wavelength) and thanks to a state-of-the-art planet population synthesis tool, the performance and the possible exoplanet detection yield of these configurations are presented. Without considering platform stability constraints, a CubeSat (baseline of b 1 m and pupils diameter of D 0.1 m) could detect 7 Jovian exoplanets, a small satellite (b 5 m / D 0.25 m) 120 exoplanets, whereas a medium satellite (b 12.5 m / D 0.5 m) could detect 1/4250 exoplanets including 51 rocky planets within 20 pc. To complete our study, an analysis of the platform stability constraints (tip/tilt and optical path difference) is performed. Exoplanet studies impose very stringent requirements on both tip/tilt and OPD control.
KW - astronomy
KW - exoplanets
KW - interferometry
KW - satellites
KW - space optics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092715691&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/1.JATIS.6.3.035004
DO - 10.1117/1.JATIS.6.3.035004
M3 - Article
SN - 2329-4124
VL - 6
JO - Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems
JF - Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems
IS - 3
M1 - 035004
ER -