Exploring the nature and synchronicity of early cluster formation in the Large Magellanic Cloud - II. Relative ages and distances for six ancient globular clusters

R. Wagner-Kaiser*, Dougal Mackey, Ata Sarajedini, Brian Chaboyer, Roger E. Cohen, Soung Chul Yang, Jeffrey D. Cummings, Doug Geisler, Aaron J. Grocholski

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    31 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We analyse Hubble Space Telescope observations of six globular clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) from programme GO-14164 in Cycle 23. These are the deepest available observations of the LMC globular cluster population; their uniformity facilitates a precise comparison with globular clusters in the Milky Way. Measuring the magnitude of the mainsequence turn-off point relative to template Galactic globular clusters allows the relative ages of the clusters to be determined with a mean precision of 8.4 per cent, and down to 6 per cent for individual objects. We find that the mean age of our LMC cluster ensemble is identical to the mean age of the oldest metal-poor clusters in the Milky Way halo to 0.2 ± 0.4 Gyr. This provides the most sensitive test to date of the synchronicity of the earliest epoch of globular cluster formation in two independent galaxies. Horizontal branch magnitudes and subdwarf fitting to the main sequence allow us to determine distance estimates for each cluster and examine their geometric distribution in the LMC. Using two different methods, we find an average distance to the LMC of 18.52 ± 0.05.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3347-3358
    Number of pages12
    JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
    Volume471
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the nature and synchronicity of early cluster formation in the Large Magellanic Cloud - II. Relative ages and distances for six ancient globular clusters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this