External auditors' reliance on management's experts: The effects of an early-stage conversation and past auditor–client relationship

Prerana Agrawal*, Isabel Z. Wang, David Woodliff

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study examines the impact of an early-stage conversation with a management's expert on auditors' decisions within the context of auditor–client relationships. We conducted a 2 × 2 between-subjects experiment with 69 experienced auditors in Australia. Our results suggest that an early-stage conversation can adversely affect perceived client flexibility towards proposed audit adjustments, particularly under contentious client conditions. Our results further indicate that an early-stage conversation results in auditors relaxing, which otherwise might be a more contentious approach towards difficult clients. While we do not find direct evidence that auditors succumb to pressure and accept the work of the management's expert without any changes, our results suggest that auditors are willing to propose an adjustment that meets the interests of both auditor and client.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)166-187
    Number of pages22
    JournalInternational Journal of Auditing
    Volume25
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'External auditors' reliance on management's experts: The effects of an early-stage conversation and past auditor–client relationship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this