TY - JOUR
T1 - Fauna-habitat relaionships
T2 - A basis for identifying key stand structural attributes in temperate Australian eucalypt forests and woodlands
AU - McElhinny, Chris
AU - Gibbons, Phil
AU - Brack, C.
AU - Bauhus, Juergen
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - We review a representative sample of the literature concerning fauna-habitat relationships in temperate Australian eucalypt forests and woodlands as a basis for identifying some key stand structural attributes in these ecosystems. Our review identifies 56 studies in south-east and south-west Australia in which the presence or abundance of different fauna were significantly associated with vegetation structural attributes at the scale of a stand. The majority of these studies concern bird, arboreal mammal, and ground mammal habitat requirements, with relatively few studies addressing the habitat requirements of reptiles, invertebrates, bats or amphibians. We identify 34 key structural attributes from these 56 studies, by grouping similar attributes, and then representing each group with a single generic attribute. Relatively few of these attributes are incorporated into indices used to quantify fauna habitat. We highlight the need for a quantitative method for selecting which key attributes should form the basis for an index of structural complexity or other surrogate measure of faunal diversity.
AB - We review a representative sample of the literature concerning fauna-habitat relationships in temperate Australian eucalypt forests and woodlands as a basis for identifying some key stand structural attributes in these ecosystems. Our review identifies 56 studies in south-east and south-west Australia in which the presence or abundance of different fauna were significantly associated with vegetation structural attributes at the scale of a stand. The majority of these studies concern bird, arboreal mammal, and ground mammal habitat requirements, with relatively few studies addressing the habitat requirements of reptiles, invertebrates, bats or amphibians. We identify 34 key structural attributes from these 56 studies, by grouping similar attributes, and then representing each group with a single generic attribute. Relatively few of these attributes are incorporated into indices used to quantify fauna habitat. We highlight the need for a quantitative method for selecting which key attributes should form the basis for an index of structural complexity or other surrogate measure of faunal diversity.
KW - Biodiversity indicator
KW - Fauna habitat
KW - Forest structure
KW - Structural attribute
KW - Structural complexity
KW - Woodland structure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745844488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1071/PC060089
DO - 10.1071/PC060089
M3 - Review article
SN - 1038-2097
VL - 12
SP - 89
EP - 110
JO - Pacific Conservation Biology
JF - Pacific Conservation Biology
IS - 2
ER -