Faunal response to revegetation in agricultural areas of Australia: A review

Nicola T. Munro*, David B. Lindenmayer, Joern Fischer

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    116 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We reviewed the literature on fauna in revegetation in Australian agricultural areas. Of 27 studies, 22 examined birds, with few studies focusing on other faunal groups (four to six studies for each remaining group) and nine examined multiple groups. Existing evidence suggests that revegetation provides habitat for many species of bird and some arboreal marsupials. Species richness of birds was greater in revegetated areas that were large, wide, structurally complex, old and near remnant vegetation. Bats, small terrestrial mammals, reptiles and amphibians did not appear to benefit significantly from revegetation in the short term. Evidence to date suggests that revegetation is not a good replacement of remnant vegetation for many species. Key information gaps exist in the faunal response to (i) revegetation as it ages; (ii) different structural complexities of revegetation; (iii) revegetation that is composed of indigenous vs. non-indigenous plant species; and (iv) revegetation that is in riparian vs. non-riparian locations. In addition, little is known on the value of revegetation for declining or threatened fauna, or of the composition of fauna in revegetation. There is a need to better understand the balance between quantity of revegetation in the landscape, and the quality or complexity of revegetation at the patch scale. Based on current evidence, we recommend revegetation be conducted in patches that are large, wide and structurally complex to maximize the benefits to fauna.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)199-207
    Number of pages9
    JournalEcological Management and Restoration
    Volume8
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Faunal response to revegetation in agricultural areas of Australia: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this