Female leader popularity and the vote, 1996–2016: A global exploratory analysis

Ruth Dassonneville, Stephen Quinlan, Ian McAllister

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Female politicians are assumed to suffer from gender bias in the political arena but existing research finds little evidence of an electoral cost to being a female candidate. Existing studies, however, have focused mostly on candidates, not leaders for top political office. Also, most evidence on this topic comes from a small number of countries. Using data from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Integrated Module Dataset, covering 600 leaders in 46 states globally over 20 years, we show that even though female party leaders are, on average, more liked than male leaders, this advantage is limited to experienced politicians. Furthermore, we demonstrate that despite this popularity advantage, parties that have a female leader do not appear to benefit from their leadership electorally.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)341-359
    Number of pages19
    JournalEuropean Journal of Politics and Gender
    Volume4
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Female leader popularity and the vote, 1996–2016: A global exploratory analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this