Fickle consent

Tom Dougherty*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why is consent revocable? In other words, why must we respect someone's present dissent at the expense of her past consent? This essay argues against act-based explanations and in favor of a rule-based explanation. A rule prioritizing present consent will serve our interests the best, in light of our interests in having flexibility over our consent and in minimizing the possibility of error in people's judgments about whether we consent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-40
Number of pages16
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume167
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fickle consent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this