First impressions matter: An experimental investigation of online financial advice

Julie R. Agnew*, Hazel Bateman, Christine Eckert, Fedor Iskhakov, Jordan Louviere, Susan Thorp

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    27 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We explore how individuals assess the quality of financial advice they receive and howthey formjudgments about advisers. Using an incentivized discrete choice experiment, we show that first impressions matter: Consumers more often follow advisers who dispense good advice before bad.We demonstrate how clients' opinions of adviser quality can be manipulated by using an easily replicated confirmation strategy that depends on the quality of the advice and the difficulty and order of the advice topics. Our results also reveal how clients benefit from their own past experience and how they use professional credentials to guide their choices.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)288-307
    Number of pages20
    JournalManagement Science
    Volume64
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'First impressions matter: An experimental investigation of online financial advice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this