"For the children...": Aboriginal Australia, cultural access, and archival obligation

Brenda Croft, Sandy Toussaint, Felicity Meakins, Patrick McConvell

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    For whom are archival documents created and conserved? Who is obliged to care for them and provide access to their content, and for how long? The state, libraries, museums and galleries, researchers, interlocutors, genealogists, family heritage organisations? Or does material collected long ago and then archived belong personally, socially, emotionally, culturally, and intellectually to the people from whom the original material was collected and, eventually, to their descendants? In a colonised nation, additional ethical and epistemological questions arise: Are archives protected and accessed for the colonised or the colonisers, or both? How are differences regarding archival creation, protection, and access distinguished, and in whose interest? Is it for future generations? What happens when archives are accessed and read by family members and/or researchers, and what happens when they are not? A focus on two interrelated stories firstly an experiential account narrated by Brenda L Croft about constructive archival management and access, and secondly a contrasting example relating how the Berndt Field Note Archive continues to be restricted from entitled claimants facilitates a return to three interrelated questions: for whom are archives created and conserved, who is obliged to care for, and authorise access to, them, and to whom do they belong?
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationArchival Returns: Central Australia and beyond
    EditorsL Barwick, J Green & P Vaarzon-Morel
    Place of PublicationHawai
    PublisherUniversity of Hawaii Press
    Pages173-191
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9781743326725
    Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '"For the children...": Aboriginal Australia, cultural access, and archival obligation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this