Forensic voice comparison with secular shibboleths - A hybrid fused GMM-multivariate likelihood ratio-based approach using alveolo-palatal fricative cepstral spectra

Phil Rose*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The suitability of voiceless fricative spectra for forensic voice comparison is explored within a Likelihood Ratio-based framework. Non-contemporaneous landline telephone recordings of 99 male Japanese speakers are compared using only tokens of their voiceless alveolo-patalal fricative [6]. A subset of mean-cepstrally-subtracted LPC CCs from the fricative spectrum from dc to 5 kHz is used. GMM/UBM and multivariate likelihood ratios are extracted for the 99 target and 4851 non-target trials, and fused with logistic regression. An EER of 7.4% and log-LR cost of 0.26 is demonstrated. It is concluded that the [6] spectrum does have some individualising potential.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publication2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2011 - Proceedings
    Pages5900-5903
    Number of pages4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011
    Event36th IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2011 - Prague, Czech Republic
    Duration: 22 May 201127 May 2011

    Publication series

    NameICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings
    ISSN (Print)1520-6149

    Conference

    Conference36th IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2011
    Country/TerritoryCzech Republic
    CityPrague
    Period22/05/1127/05/11

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Forensic voice comparison with secular shibboleths - A hybrid fused GMM-multivariate likelihood ratio-based approach using alveolo-palatal fricative cepstral spectra'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this