Forgetting ourselves: Epistemic costs and ethical concerns in mindfulness exercises

Sahanika Ratnayake, David Merry*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Mindfulness exercises are presented as being compatible with almost any spiritual, religious or philosophical beliefs. In this paper, we argue that they in fact involve imagining and conceptualising rather striking and controversial claims about the self, and the self's relationship to thoughts and feelings. For this reason, practising mindfulness exercises is likely to be in tension with many people's core beliefs and values, a tension that should be treated as a downside of therapeutic interventions involving mindfulness exercises, not unlike a side effect. Clients ought to be informed of these metaphysical aspects of the exercises, and mental health providers ought to take them into account in assessing which course of treatment to recommend. Given these concerns, the casual way in which mindfulness exercises are presently distributed by mental health providers to the general public is inappropriate.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)567-574
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
    Volume44
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Forgetting ourselves: Epistemic costs and ethical concerns in mindfulness exercises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this