From Kolmogorov, to Popper, to Renyi: There's No Escaping Humphreys' Paradox (When Generalized)

Aidan Lyon

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    Humphreys’ Paradox (Humphreys 1985) can be solved if propensity theorists (i) adopt Rényi’s 1955 probability axiom system as the correct axiom system for propensities and (ii) maintain that there are no backwards propensities in the world. A similar move can be used to solve Milne’s Problem (Milne 1985)—another common objection to the propensity interpretation. That’s the good news. However, Humphreys’ Paradox and Milne’s Problem are just two special cases of a much more general problem, and this problem causes trouble even for propensity theorists who accept (i) and (ii). That’s the bad news.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationChance and Temporal Asymmetry
    EditorsAlastair Wilson
    Place of PublicationOxford, United Kingdom
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages112-125
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9780199673421
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'From Kolmogorov, to Popper, to Renyi: There's No Escaping Humphreys' Paradox (When Generalized)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this