From principle to practice: US military strategy and protection of civilians in Afghanistan

Astri Suhrke*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    During its engagement in Afghanistan, the US military seriously tried to mitigate the risk of civilian casualties from airstrikes only when called for by changes in military doctrine emphasizing the need to gain the support of the population. Consistent efforts by external political and humanitarian actors to reduce casualties by demanding more transparency and clearer lines of accountability for ‘collateral damage’ had little immediate, observable effect. The case study underlines the contingent nature of progress towards protecting civilians in armed conflict even when a military institution formally accepts the principles of customary international humanitarian law, but concludes that, faute de mieux, strategies to enhance protection through greater accountability and attention to the kind of military ordinance used remain central.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)100-118
    Number of pages19
    JournalInternational Peacekeeping
    Volume22
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'From principle to practice: US military strategy and protection of civilians in Afghanistan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this