TY - GEN
T1 - From propositional to first-order monitoring
AU - Bauer, Andreas
AU - Küster, Jan Christoph
AU - Vegliach, Gil
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The main purpose of this paper is to introduce a first-order temporal logic, LTLFO, and a corresponding monitor construction based on a new type of automaton, called spawning automaton. Specifically, we show that monitoring a specification in LTLFO boils down to an undecidable decision problem. The proof of this result revolves around specific ideas on what we consider a "proper" monitor. As these ideas are general, we outline them first in the setting of standard LTL, before lifting them to the setting of first-order logic and LTLFO. Although due to the above result one cannot hope to obtain a complete monitor for LTLFO, we prove the soundness of our automata-based construction and give experimental results from an implementation. These seem to substantiate our hypothesis that the automata-based construction leads to efficient runtime monitors whose size does not grow with increasing trace lengths (as is often observed in similar approaches). However, we also discuss formulae for which growth is unavoidable, irrespective of the chosen monitoring approach.
AB - The main purpose of this paper is to introduce a first-order temporal logic, LTLFO, and a corresponding monitor construction based on a new type of automaton, called spawning automaton. Specifically, we show that monitoring a specification in LTLFO boils down to an undecidable decision problem. The proof of this result revolves around specific ideas on what we consider a "proper" monitor. As these ideas are general, we outline them first in the setting of standard LTL, before lifting them to the setting of first-order logic and LTLFO. Although due to the above result one cannot hope to obtain a complete monitor for LTLFO, we prove the soundness of our automata-based construction and give experimental results from an implementation. These seem to substantiate our hypothesis that the automata-based construction leads to efficient runtime monitors whose size does not grow with increasing trace lengths (as is often observed in similar approaches). However, we also discuss formulae for which growth is unavoidable, irrespective of the chosen monitoring approach.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887444663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-40787-1_4
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-40787-1_4
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9783642407864
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 59
EP - 75
BT - Runtime Verification - 4th International Conference, RV 2013, Proceedings
T2 - 4th International Conference on Runtime Verification, RV 2013
Y2 - 24 September 2013 through 27 September 2013
ER -