TY - JOUR
T1 - Funcionamiento intelectual límite
T2 - guía de consenso y buenas prácticas
AU - Salvador-Carulla, Luis
AU - García-Gutiérrez, Juan Carlos
AU - Ruiz Gutiérrez-Colosía, Mencía
AU - Artigas-Pallarès, Josep
AU - García Ibáñez, José
AU - González Pérez, Joan
AU - Nadal Pla, Margarida
AU - Aguilera Inés, Francisco
AU - Isus, Sofia
AU - Cereza, Josep Maria
AU - Poole, Miriam
AU - Portero Lazcano, Guillermo
AU - Monzón, Patricio
AU - Leiva, Marta
AU - Parellada, Mara
AU - García Nonell, Katia
AU - Martínez I Hernández, Andreu
AU - Rigau, Eugenia
AU - Martínez-Leal, Rafael
PY - 2013/7
Y1 - 2013/7
N2 - Introduction: The Borderline Intellectual Functioning (BIF) is conceptualized as the frontier that delimits "normal" intellectual functioning from intellectual disability (IQ 71-85). In spite of its magnitude, its prevalence cannot be quantified and its diagnosis has not yet been defined. Objectives: To elaborate a conceptual framework and to establish consensus guidelines. Method: A mixed qualitative methodology, including frame analysis and nominal groups techniques, was used. The literature was extensively reviewed in evidence based medical databases, scientific publications, and the grey literature. This information was studied and a framing document was prepared. Results: Scientific publications covering BIF are scarce. The term that yields a bigger number of results is "Borderline Intelligence". The Working Group detected a number of areas in which consensus was needed and wrote a consensus document covering the conclusions of the experts and the framing document. Conclusions: It is a priority to reach an international consensus about the BIF construct and its operative criteria, as well as to develop specific tools for screening and diagnosis. It is also necessary to define criteria that enable its incidence and prevalence. To know what interventions are the most efficient, and what are the needs of this population, is vital to implement an integral model of care centred on the individual.
AB - Introduction: The Borderline Intellectual Functioning (BIF) is conceptualized as the frontier that delimits "normal" intellectual functioning from intellectual disability (IQ 71-85). In spite of its magnitude, its prevalence cannot be quantified and its diagnosis has not yet been defined. Objectives: To elaborate a conceptual framework and to establish consensus guidelines. Method: A mixed qualitative methodology, including frame analysis and nominal groups techniques, was used. The literature was extensively reviewed in evidence based medical databases, scientific publications, and the grey literature. This information was studied and a framing document was prepared. Results: Scientific publications covering BIF are scarce. The term that yields a bigger number of results is "Borderline Intelligence". The Working Group detected a number of areas in which consensus was needed and wrote a consensus document covering the conclusions of the experts and the framing document. Conclusions: It is a priority to reach an international consensus about the BIF construct and its operative criteria, as well as to develop specific tools for screening and diagnosis. It is also necessary to define criteria that enable its incidence and prevalence. To know what interventions are the most efficient, and what are the needs of this population, is vital to implement an integral model of care centred on the individual.
KW - Borderline
KW - Borderline intellectual functioning
KW - Intellectual disability
KW - Intelligence
KW - Practice guidelines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879796897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rpsm.2012.12.001
DO - 10.1016/j.rpsm.2012.12.001
M3 - Article
SN - 1888-9891
VL - 6
SP - 109
EP - 120
JO - Revista de Psiquiatria y Salud Mental
JF - Revista de Psiquiatria y Salud Mental
IS - 3
ER -