Gender Differences in Ways of Knowing: The Context Dependence of the Attitudes toward Thinking and Learning Survey

Michelle K. Ryan*, Barbara David

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this article we challenge the notion of stable, gender-related differences in the way people acquire and process information, with men more likely to utilize separate knowing and women connected knowing. An alternative analysis highlights malleability and the importance of social context in determining knowing style. We examined the responses of 186 women and 81 men on the Attitudes Toward Thinking and Learning Survey (ATTLS; Galotti, Clinchy, Ainsworth, Lavin, & Mansfield, 1999) across 3 contexts. Results revealed that both men and women were more likely to use connected knowing in the context of similar in-groups compared to the context of dissimilar out-groups. Gender differences were only apparent where gender was made salient. Our data support an analysis of ways of knowing as flexible and context dependent and question the notion that knowing is intrinsically related to gender.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)693-699
    Number of pages7
    JournalSex Roles
    Volume49
    Issue number11-12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2003

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Gender Differences in Ways of Knowing: The Context Dependence of the Attitudes toward Thinking and Learning Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this