Gender gaps in indigenous socioeconomic outcomes: Australian regional comparisons and international possibilities

Mandy Yap*, Nicholas Biddle

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    International literature clearly demonstrates the potential for gender-based inequalities to constrain development processes. In the United Nations Development Programme Gender-related Development Index, Australia ranks in the top five across 177 countries, suggesting that the loss of human development due to gender inequality is minor. However, such analysis has not been systematically applied to the Indigenous Australian population, at least in a quantitative sense. Using the 2006 Australian Census, this paper provides an analysis across three dimensions of socioeconomic disparity: Indigeneity, gender, and geography. This paper also explores the development of a similar gender-related index as a tool to enable a relative ranking of the performance of Indigenous males and females at the regional level across a set of socioeconomic outcomes. The initial findings suggest that although there is a substantial development gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, the development loss from gender-related inequality for Indigenous Australians is relatively small. Higher life expectancy and education attainment for Indigenous females balances out their slightly lower earnings to a large extent. At the regional level, Indigenous females tend to fare better than Indigenous males for the set of indicators chosen; and, this is particularly true in capital cities.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number3
    JournalInternational Indigenous Policy Journal
    Volume1
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Gender gaps in indigenous socioeconomic outcomes: Australian regional comparisons and international possibilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this