Gender gaps in REDD+: Women's participation is not enough

Anne M. Larson*, Therese Dokken, Amy E. Duchelle, Stibniati Atmadja, Ida Ayu Pradnja Resosudarmo, Peter Cronkleton, Marina Cromberg, William Sunderlin, Abdon Awono, Galia Selaya

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concern over the contribution of forest clearing and degradation to climate change has led to the promotion of strategies for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+). REDD+ is intended to be a performancebased mechanism whereby forest stakeholders at multiple scales (from national to household levels) could be rewarded for protecting or enhancing the carbon sequestration capacity of forests (Angelsen 2009). Since the initial proposal by the coalition of rainforest countries, led by Papua New Guinea and Costa Rica, at the UNFCCC 11th Conference of Parties (COP) in 2005 in Montreal, REDD+ has been placed rmly on the global climate change agenda.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGender and Forests
Subtitle of host publicationClimate Change, Tenure, Value Chains and Emerging Issues
PublisherTaylor and Francis Inc.
Pages68-88
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781315666624
ISBN (Print)9781138955035
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender gaps in REDD+: Women's participation is not enough'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this