Gendered Contributions to Parliamentary Debates: The Case of Euthanasia

Sharon Broughton, Sonia Palmieri

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    38 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper seeks to extend our understanding of the contribution women parliamentarians make to the Commonwealth parliament. The euthanasia debate, precipitated by the 1996 Andrews Bill, provided a rare opportunity to compare male and female parliamentarians' contributions without the constraint of formal party discipline. This unusual set of circumstances allowed us to focus on whether women make a distinctive contribution to parliamentary debate, without the complicating influence of party. We have been able to show that under certain circumstances, women do bring a different focus to parliamentary debate, and in so doing, may, in sufficient numbers, alter the status quo.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)29-45
    Number of pages17
    JournalAustralian Journal of Political Science
    Volume34
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 1999

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Gendered Contributions to Parliamentary Debates: The Case of Euthanasia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this