Abstract
This paper seeks to extend our understanding of the contribution women parliamentarians make to the Commonwealth parliament. The euthanasia debate, precipitated by the 1996 Andrews Bill, provided a rare opportunity to compare male and female parliamentarians' contributions without the constraint of formal party discipline. This unusual set of circumstances allowed us to focus on whether women make a distinctive contribution to parliamentary debate, without the complicating influence of party. We have been able to show that under certain circumstances, women do bring a different focus to parliamentary debate, and in so doing, may, in sufficient numbers, alter the status quo.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 29-45 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 1999 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gendered Contributions to Parliamentary Debates: The Case of Euthanasia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver