General practitioner trainees' in-consultation generation of clinical questions for later answering: Prevalence and associations

Background. As well as generating patient-specific questions, patient consultations are a rich source of questions relating to clinicians' need to acquire or maintain wider clinical knowledge. This is especially so for GP trainees. Objectives. To establish the prevalence and associations of GP trainees' generation of 'learning goals' (LGs: questions generated during clinical consultations for intended post-consultation answering). Also, to characterize the type of learning goals generated. Methods. A cross-sectional analysis (2010-15) of an ongoing cohort study of Australian GP trainees' consultations. Once each 6-month training term, trainees record detailed data of 60 consecutive consultations. The primary outcome was generation of an LG. Analysis was at the level of individual problem/diagnosis managed. The secondary outcome was the problems/diagnoses to which the LGs related. Results. One thousand one hundred and twenty-four trainees contributed data for 154 746 consultations including 222 307 problems/diagnoses. LGs were generated for 16.6% [95% confidence intervals (CI) = 16.4-16.7] of problems/diagnoses, in 22.1% (95% CI = 21.9-22.3%) of consultations. Associations of LGs included patient factors: younger age and having seen the trainee previously; trainee factors: earlier training stage, being overseas-trained and the trainee's training organization; consultation factors: longer duration, addressing a chronic disease, referring the patient, organizing follow-up, organizing investigations and accessing in-consultation information. LGs were commonly generated for skin (12.9% of all learning goals), musculoskeletal (12.7%) and respiratory (8.7%) problems. LGs were generated for 31.8% of male genital, 27.0% of neurological and 23.3% of eye problems. Conclusion. Australian GP trainees frequently generate questions in-consultation to be pursued post-consultation. Prevalence, 'complexity' and familiarity of clinical topic area influenced LG generation.