TY - GEN
T1 - Gesture based interface for robot control
AU - Nebout, Florian
AU - Taylor, Ken
AU - Mendis, Sumudu
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - We present an innovative way to control a robot arm by using a gesture interface. It places the project in its industrial context and gives the background in terms of robot arm control and hand-gesture interfaces. The interface is applied here to remote manual control of a mini-robot arm. The method solves a remote control problem encountered by workers needing to control a remote viewing system where their hands are already busy with other tasks. It is also intended to be more intuitive than traditional joy stick control. The solution is described in terms of design and implementation issues. It consists of a hardware free hand tracking system that enables 3D control with only one hand. A common user interface is also designed using a joystick gamepad controller. Finally, the control solution is compared with the gamepad and another efficient method of control, a haptic device. The gesture interface performed better than the joystick interface but not as well as the much more expensive haptic interface. The major two disadvantages of the gesture interface are the lack of force feedback and the fatigue it introduces for the user.
AB - We present an innovative way to control a robot arm by using a gesture interface. It places the project in its industrial context and gives the background in terms of robot arm control and hand-gesture interfaces. The interface is applied here to remote manual control of a mini-robot arm. The method solves a remote control problem encountered by workers needing to control a remote viewing system where their hands are already busy with other tasks. It is also intended to be more intuitive than traditional joy stick control. The solution is described in terms of design and implementation issues. It consists of a hardware free hand tracking system that enables 3D control with only one hand. A common user interface is also designed using a joystick gamepad controller. Finally, the control solution is compared with the gamepad and another efficient method of control, a haptic device. The gesture interface performed better than the joystick interface but not as well as the much more expensive haptic interface. The major two disadvantages of the gesture interface are the lack of force feedback and the fatigue it introduces for the user.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871705683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9786028566858
T3 - Proceedings - APCHI-ERGOFUTURE 2010
SP - 680
EP - 685
BT - Proceedings - APCHI-ERGOFUTURE 2010
T2 - Joint International Conference on Asia Pasific Computer Human Interaction and Ergofuture 2010, APCHI-ERGOFUTURE 2010
Y2 - 2 August 2010 through 6 August 2010
ER -