Global citizenship and neo-republicanism? Problematising the 'neoliberal subjectivities' critique

April Biccum*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Global Citizenship Education (GCE) has been taken up by the UN on its educational platform under SDG 4, coupled with the Preventing Violent Extremism through Education (PVE-E) initiative, and intersecting with the Youth Engagement agenda. GCE is often criticised as the neo-imperialist attempt to produce �neo-liberal subjectivities� to further entrench the market and move young people away from genuine anti-systemic critique. This chapter problematises the �neoliberal subjectivities� critique by arguing that as a part of the Post-Washington Consensus, GCE is part of a dramatic shift in the global understanding of development and education and therefore is better understood as part of a Polanyian style �double movement�. Using documentary process tracing and discourse analysis, the chapter argues that the UN/UNESCO formulation of GCE/PVE-E makes two gestures. On the one hand it is a further iteration of the development�security nexus, and, second, the proposed subjectivity of the �global citizen� is a republican citizen (in the absence of a global republic), that is a citizen whose capacity for participation in the market consists also of the same skills required for the construction of a global democracy. This chapter critically examines what�s at stake in the UN�s marshalling of classical republican cosmopolitanism in the context of the erosion of the legitimacy of �the global�.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Global Citizenship Nexus
    Subtitle of host publicationCritical Studies
    PublisherTaylor and Francis
    Pages129-152
    Number of pages24
    ISBN (Electronic)9781000062786
    ISBN (Print)9780367335816
    Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Global citizenship and neo-republicanism? Problematising the 'neoliberal subjectivities' critique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this