TY - JOUR
T1 - Global GRACE Data Assimilation for Groundwater and Drought Monitoring
T2 - Advances and Challenges
AU - Li, Bailing
AU - Rodell, Matthew
AU - Kumar, Sujay
AU - Beaudoing, Hiroko Kato
AU - Getirana, Augusto
AU - Zaitchik, Benjamin F.
AU - de Goncalves, Luis Gustavo
AU - Cossetin, Camila
AU - Bhanja, Soumendra
AU - Mukherjee, Abhijit
AU - Tian, Siyuan
AU - Tangdamrongsub, Natthachet
AU - Long, Di
AU - Nanteza, Jamiat
AU - Lee, Jejung
AU - Policelli, Frederick
AU - Goni, Ibrahim B.
AU - Daira, Djoret
AU - Bila, Mohammed
AU - de Lannoy, Gabriëlle
AU - Mocko, David
AU - Steele-Dunne, Susan C.
AU - Save, Himanshu
AU - Bettadpur, Srinivas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - The scarcity of groundwater storage change data at the global scale hinders our ability to monitor groundwater resources effectively. In this study, we assimilate a state-of-the-art terrestrial water storage product derived from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite observations into NASA's Catchment land surface model (CLSM) at the global scale, with the goal of generating groundwater storage time series that are useful for drought monitoring and other applications. Evaluation using in situ data from nearly 4,000 wells shows that GRACE data assimilation improves the simulation of groundwater, with estimation errors reduced by 36% and 10% and correlation improved by 16% and 22% at the regional and point scales, respectively. The biggest improvements are observed in regions with large interannual variability in precipitation, where simulated groundwater responds too strongly to changes in atmospheric forcing. The positive impacts of GRACE data assimilation are further demonstrated using observed low-flow data. CLSM and GRACE data assimilation performance is also examined across different permeability categories. The evaluation reveals that GRACE data assimilation fails to compensate for the lack of a groundwater withdrawal scheme in CLSM when it comes to simulating realistic groundwater variations in regions with intensive groundwater abstraction. CLSM-simulated groundwater correlates strongly with 12-month precipitation anomalies in low-latitude and midlatitude areas. A groundwater drought indicator based on GRACE data assimilation generally agrees with other regional-scale drought indicators, with discrepancies mainly in their estimated drought severity.
AB - The scarcity of groundwater storage change data at the global scale hinders our ability to monitor groundwater resources effectively. In this study, we assimilate a state-of-the-art terrestrial water storage product derived from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite observations into NASA's Catchment land surface model (CLSM) at the global scale, with the goal of generating groundwater storage time series that are useful for drought monitoring and other applications. Evaluation using in situ data from nearly 4,000 wells shows that GRACE data assimilation improves the simulation of groundwater, with estimation errors reduced by 36% and 10% and correlation improved by 16% and 22% at the regional and point scales, respectively. The biggest improvements are observed in regions with large interannual variability in precipitation, where simulated groundwater responds too strongly to changes in atmospheric forcing. The positive impacts of GRACE data assimilation are further demonstrated using observed low-flow data. CLSM and GRACE data assimilation performance is also examined across different permeability categories. The evaluation reveals that GRACE data assimilation fails to compensate for the lack of a groundwater withdrawal scheme in CLSM when it comes to simulating realistic groundwater variations in regions with intensive groundwater abstraction. CLSM-simulated groundwater correlates strongly with 12-month precipitation anomalies in low-latitude and midlatitude areas. A groundwater drought indicator based on GRACE data assimilation generally agrees with other regional-scale drought indicators, with discrepancies mainly in their estimated drought severity.
KW - global GRACE data assimilation
KW - global groundwater drought monitoring
KW - groundwater drought
KW - groundwater storage estimates
KW - groundwater temporal variability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071768642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2018WR024618
DO - 10.1029/2018WR024618
M3 - Article
SN - 0043-1397
VL - 55
SP - 7564
EP - 7586
JO - Water Resources Research
JF - Water Resources Research
IS - 9
ER -