Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

GM Canola on the Prairie: gene patents, farmers rights

Matthew Rimmer

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationGeneral Article

    Abstract

    On 20 January 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada heard an appeal by Percy Schmeiser, a 73 year old canola farmer from Bruno, Saskatchewan, against findings that he had infringed the patents of the biotechnology company Monsanto. The matter raises important questions about gene patents, innocent infringement, and farmers rights. Are biological inventions patentable like mechanical inventions? Can an innocent bystander be held liable for infringing a patent? Should farmers privileges to save seed trump patent rights and technology user agreements? The case concerns a Canadian patent granted to Monsanto in 1993 for an invention named Glyphosate-Resistant Plants. The patent was for man-made genetically engineered genes, and cells containing those genes which, when inserted in plants, in this canola, make those plants resistant to glyphosate herbicides such as Monsantos product Roundup Ready.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages1-6pp
    No.26 March 2004
    Specialist publicationOpen Democracy
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'GM Canola on the Prairie: gene patents, farmers rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this